Archive for October, 2006

Eating up the Earth

Wednesday, October 25th, 2006

This just in from Reuters news source:

By Ben Blanchard

BEIJING (Reuters) - Humans are stripping nature at an unprecedented rate and will need two planets’ worth of natural resources every year by 2050 on current trends, the WWF conservation group said on Tuesday.

Populations of many species, from fish to mammals, had fallen by about a third from 1970 to 2003 largely because of human threats such as pollution, clearing of forests and overfishing, the group also said in a two-yearly report.

“For more than 20 years we have exceeded the earth’s ability to support a consumptive lifestyle that is unsustainable and we cannot afford to continue down this path,” WWF Director-General James Leape said, launching the WWF’s 2006 Living Planet Report.

“If everyone around the world lived as those in America, we would need five planets to support us,” Leape, an American, said in Beijing.

People in the United Arab Emirates were placing most stress per capita on the planet ahead of those in the United States, Finland and Canada, the report said.

(more…)

Broken Window Theory

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Broken_windows_1

If you have read Malcolm Gladwell’s TIPPING POINT, then you are probably familiar with the Broken Windows theory and its impact on helping to reduce crime in New York City during the 1990s. Gladwell writes,

“Broken Windows was the brainchild of the criminologists James Q. Wilson and George Kelling. Wilson and Kelling argued that crime is the inevitable result of disorder. If a window is broken and left unrepaired, people walking by will conclude that no one cares and no one is in charge. Soon, more windows will be broken, and the sense of anarchy will spread from the building to the street on which it faces, sending a signal that anything goes.”

Michael Levine, author and media/PR expert, has just published a book, BROKEN WINDOWS BROKEN BUSINESS, applying the broken windows theory to business. Levine’s premise is that a broken window in business happens when someone isn’t paying attention to details. Levine writes,

“A broken window can be a sloppy counter, a poorly located sale item, a randomly organized menu, or an employee with a bad attitude. It can be physical, like a faded, flaking paint job, or symbolic, like a policy that requires consumers to pay for customer service. When the waiter at a Chinese restaurant is named Billy Bob, that’s a broken window. When a call for help assembling a bicycle results in a twenty-minute hold on the phone (playing the same music over and over), that’s a broken window. When a consumer asks why she can’t return her blouse at the counter and is told, “Because that’s the rule,” that is a broken window. They’re everywhere. Except at the really sharp businesses.” [SOURCE LINK]

According to Levine, broken windows are telltale signs to customers that a business doesn’t care, that it is poorly managed, and or it has become too big and arrogant to adequately deal with little details.

He warns businesses that customers draw wide-ranging conclusions based upon their perceptions of the broken windows they find. These negative perceptions will undermine a business as they can turn once highly-satisfied customers into very-dissatisfied customers who choose take their business elsewhere.

Levine contends the best time to fix a broken window is the moment they occur. He continues by saying the only sustainable way to avoid and repair broken windows is to foster a culture where obsession to detail and a compulsive drive to fix broken windows permeates throughout a business.

According to James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling, “A successful strategy for preventing vandalism, say the book’s authors, is to fix the problems when they are small. Repair the broken windows within a short time, say, a day or a week, and the tendency is that vandals are much less likely to break more windows or do further damage. Clean up the sidewalk every day, and the tendency is for litter not to accumulate (or for the rate of littering to be much less). Problems do not escalate and thus respectable residents do not flee a neighborhood. The theory thus makes two major claims: 1) further petty crime and low-level anti-social behavior will be deterred, and thus 2) major crime will be prevented. Criticism of the theory has tended to focus only on the latter claim.”

It truly is amazing what such a small changes can make.

So does this theory relate to you and your business in any way? If so, how? Sound off.

Visual Pollution

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Maybe the video clip below does very little to concern you. After all, your not the one responsible for the city’s sore eye, nor is there anything you can do to fix it. Who’s problem is it anyway? Is it the city’s problem? or is it a problem only for the men and women and children who call this place their home which only occupies a microscopic slither of land on what we call planet earth?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77tlgjdeGwM

The reality is that, this example of “visual pollution” is unfortunately everyone’s problem. When I say everyone, I mean everyone as in the entire world. I mean all of humankind. There is not one person on the face of this planet that is exempt from the devastion and destruction caused by our fellow man whether it is in South Africa or in the next town over. In fact, it really doesn’t matter how far away you are from it…just know matters will only get worse before they get better.

Well, again you may be thinking “so what” this is not my problem and I could really care less about what goes on in a place where I be lucky to visit once or twice in my entire life (and that’s only because Mister wasn’t paying attention and accidentally got off the wrong exit). Decidedly so, if it’s not your problem now it might become yours one day or worst yet, passed on to your children and their children’s children (that never ending cycle).

Anyway, the point of my post (by the way thanks for reading this far down in the post!) is no matter how daunting of a task it may seem to rid this cancer and make our environment a better place to live (not just for us but for our great, great grandchildren) is there is no one who is without resources to change the world. In other words, everyone and anyone has the resources available to make a difference.

Whether that difference is on a large or small scale, the message is LOUD and CLEAR: It all depends on you. It depends on each and everyone of us. As Daniel Quinn said,

“USE YOUR BEST RESOURCES TO DO WHAT YOU CAN DO. And that’s what I’m doing. Doing what I do best, I’m reaching hundreds of thousands of people all over the world in the cause of saving the world.”

We love this one…

Monday, October 16th, 2006

Small is the new big

Taken directly from Seth Godin’s blog at www.sethgodin.com

Big used to matter. Big meant economies of scale. (You never hear about “economies of tiny” do you?) People, usually guys, often ex-Marines, wanted to be CEO of a big company. The Fortune 500 is where people went to make… a fortune.  

There was a good reason for this. Value was added in ways that big organizations were good at. Value was added with efficient manufacturing, widespread distribution and very large R&D staffs. Value came from hundreds of operators standing by and from nine-figure TV ad budgets. Value came from a huge sales force.

Of course, it’s not just big organizations that added value. Big planes were better than small ones, because they were faster and more efficient. Big buildings were better than small ones because they facilitated communications and used downtown land quite efficiently. Bigger computers could handle more simultaneous users, as well.

(more…)